Showing posts with label giraffes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label giraffes. Show all posts
Saturday, May 28, 2011
Tuesday, May 03, 2011
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
I like my giraffes alive, thanks
If you always thought the stuffed menagerie at Nixon Park was uber-creepy, be forewarned; you might want to stop reading this post now.
| via the blog of granite I refuse to post a larger or more detailed picture of plastinated humans; I hope this one is enough to give you the general idea. Also, I relish any opportunity to insert pictures of Daniel Craig. |
Controversial anatomist Gunther von Hagens, father of plastination and the associated Body Worlds exhibition -- famously depicted in Casino Royale--has reestablished the public display of his technique in his native Germany. As a result of a series of legal challenges, the original Body Worlds exhibit has, according to Wikipedia, been absent from that country since the Summer of 2004.
The new exhibit, entitled Körperwelten Der Tiere (Bodyworlds of Animals) features plastinated specimens of species other than Homo sapiens sapiens, including Troglodytes gorilla, Struthio camelus, and Giraffa camelopardalis.
Anatomist Gunther von Hagens looks at a plastinated giraffe
during an exhibition at Neunkirchen Zoo in Neunkirchen near Saarbruecken March 19, 2010. REUTERS/Ralph Orlowski |
I've viewed plastination with a critical gaze ever since graduate school, where I read and presented a scholarly article by sociologist Tony Walter in my Anthropological Perspectives on Body and Person module (I considered rereading it before commencing this blog post, but alas, it disappeared, along with many a PDF, when my last hard drive kicked the bucket.)
ABSRACT: Plastination provides a new method, governed by medical technique rather than religious ritual, by which human remains may be transformed from unstable/wet to stable/dry. In the Körperwelten/Body Worlds exhibition, the public pay to view plastinated bodies, and are invited to donate their bodies for plastination after death. This article addresses the question of whether Body Worlds visitors accept plastination for display as a legitimate form of disposal. Three sources of data are drawn on: the ethnographer's account of his first visit to the exhibition in Brussels; the written comments of visitors to the London exhibition; and the stated motives of some donors. Plastination as final disposal is accepted by the vast majority of visitors; they perceive the dry, odourless body interiors within the clinical, scientific framework encouraged by the exhibition, and are often fascinated by what they see. This is complicated, however, by certain surface features and modes of display which enable the problematic reinsertion of personhood. So, plastination itself is accepted, but not all forms of display.As I recall, one of the most interesting insights to come from that article and the subsequent class discussion on the voyeuristic dimension of plastination was that, as the only American in a British classroom I was the only one to have ever seen a dead person; open-casket funerals are extremely rare in Britain. (I'd be interesting in reading this article by Linda Schulte-Sasse on the Americanization of Bodyworlds.)
Walter, T. (2004), PLASTINATION FOR DISPLAY: A NEW WAY TO DISPOSE OF THE DEAD. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 10: 603–627. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2004.00204.x
I'm not going to deny that human anatomy is fascinating; you're talking to a girl who can easily spend an hour just thumbing through the pages of Emily's Color Atlas of Anatomy. But I have never and have no desire to EVER see the original Bodyworlds, probably owing in large part to a NAGPRA-induced wariness towards human remains of sketchy provenance. For more insight into the moral and ethical objections to the display of plastinated cadavers, check out stopbodyworlds.)
![]() | |||||
| via Animalfwd |
The more the individual thinks about the fragility of his or her body, the more respectful he or she will become toward other people and animals. BODY WORLDS of ANIMALS makes a valuable contribution to animal welfare and to increased appreciation of endangered species.I think that statement is something of what we like to call in English, "a stretch." (No pun intended. Ha ha ha.)
You know what REALLY makes people more respectful of animals? Living, breathing animals. As opposed to glorified taxidermy.
P.S. This is the shirt I'm wearing as I type this. Christmas present
from Emily from, if you can believe it, Five Below.
P.P.S. Everything I ever wanted/needed to know about giraffes,
I learned from reading Tall Blondes: A Book About Giraffes by Lynn Sherr
Thursday, April 14, 2011
giraffe of the week
*I thought I published this ages ago. I think I've referenced it in other blog posts. Oops.
In an effort to update this here weblog experiment more regularly, I introduce "Giraffe of the Week," whereby I feature of one of my many, many various and assorted giraffe collectibles et. al. and... yeah, that's about it. I've loved the giraffes way longer than the ladybugs (you know like, since birth), so doing one a week should keep me posting until at least 2015.
In an effort to update this here weblog experiment more regularly, I introduce "Giraffe of the Week," whereby I feature of one of my many, many various and assorted giraffe collectibles et. al. and... yeah, that's about it. I've loved the giraffes way longer than the ladybugs (you know like, since birth), so doing one a week should keep me posting until at least 2015.
Friday, April 08, 2011
Kid-sized, giraffe-themed kitchen utensils
Observed (and documented) today at Target (East York). Surprisingly enough, I DIDN'T buy it. There was only one; if it's there next time, I'll take it as a sign. In my defense, it wouldn't be completely useless because there IS a Montessori practical life activity for whisking. And if that whisk doesn't constitute a point of interest, I don't know what does.
| Via On the Shelf |
Monday, April 04, 2011
a belated happy birthday, featuring CRAFTS!
![]() |
| Hi Baby Sister! |
The big news from before I left for California, sadly simultaneous with the Japan earthquake/tsunami, was the long-awaited birth of Baby Sister (Lily's, not mine.)
Belatedly introducing to the world (i.e. this blog's pitifully small readership), Miss Emeline Rachel, born March 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, 8 lbs. 7.8 oz.
| Shimmer! |
I started out really meticulous with keeping the gauge consistent, but got lazier (read: looser with the stitches) as time went by; the outer edges are straightish instead of straight (even after I tried blocking - and I never bother to block. My OCD self can hardly stand to look at the picture.)
| Try to ignore my pasty neck. |
Amanda had sent me this pattern ages ago, but it was only within the last year that I finally got around to buying the yarn to start one in the suggested colors. That one lounges, disarticulated, in my in progress bag, waiting for the next imminent baby to spur me into finishing it.
But anyway, when I finished the first giraffe , everyone who saw it (i.e. my family), raved about how cute it was, even with its somewhat gimpy eyes (the pattern calls for plastic safety eyes - I embroidered mine instead). The initial plan was to make its mate (or rather, its sister - one for Lil, one for Em) a different species all together, but I couldn't find an other Amigurumi pattern (free anyway) as cute as this one. (Suggestions are welcome.) And so another giraffe it was; the second one was made, literally, in one night. As to their durability? I'll have to get back to you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




